Post by muntahaislam222 on Feb 28, 2024 11:18:05 GMT 1
If the police catch you with your car in poor condition, you will receive a serious fine. But if the highway is full of potholes, nothing happens to the traffic authority. It seems unfair, doesn't it? That could change very soon, here's why: Do you want to pass the Detran theoretical test the first time? So CLICK HERE and see what the master of video lessons, Ronaldo Cardoso, says. It could become law PL (Bill) 2101/23 , authored by Representative Eli Borges (PL-TO) proposes that it is PROHIBITED to fine drivers on roads that are potholed, have poor signage or are not properly maintained, see: Art. 1 Article 280 of the Brazilian Traffic Code comes into force with the addition of the following single paragraph: […] “Art. 280-A. The fine may only be imposed on roads and highways that meet the appropriate signage and conservation criteria , as defined by the executive bodies and entities of traffic and road infrastructure.” [Continues after ad] Difficulties of this “New Law” What, at first glance, seems like an excellent idea, can also have its negative points or implementation difficulties.
See at least three points to be analyzed: 1. The inspection body is not always the same one that works to maintain the road . For example: on a federal highway, it is the DNIT (National Department of Infrastructure and Transport) who maintains the pavement and signage, but the PRF (Federal Highway Police) acts as inspector. In this way, the negligence of the first would directly impact the performance of the second, which is not administratively viable. 2. How to Europe Mobile Number List define, precisely, what this “poor state of conservation” would be? Imagine that a driver could contest a ticket because there is a single pothole on the highway. “Ah, but that’s very little, you can’t say that the road is bad.” Perfectly, so would it be 10 holes? But at what spacing? One kilometer, two […]? Do you understand the complexity of this? 3. We would have the sum of NEGLIGENCE, from the body that did not maintain the road, with the recklessness of drivers who cannot be fined there. Imagine if anything good will come out of this “explosive mixture”! Obviously, this would significantly increase the risk of accidents on these stretches.
PL adequacy suggestion You may not know, but the amounts collected from traffic fines ARE NOT necessarily allocated to the maintenance of highways and roads – which commonly ends up diverting these amounts to completely adverse traffic purposes. Therefore, perhaps it would be more interesting if the Law REQUIRED that 100% of the amounts collected from traffic fines be applied to the conservation and maintenance of these roads. This way, we would not give up monitoring bad drivers, but we would have the guarantee of the appropriate use of our money. [Continues after ad] Conclusion And you, what is your opinion on this? Click on this link and comment with one of the following two alternatives: 1. Leave the bill as it is, that is, YOU CANNOT FINE on potholed roads. Running the risk of never being fined, but at the same time, walking forever on highways abandoned by public authorities. 2. You can impose a fine, but it requires 100% of the amounts to be used to maintain the road where the fine was applied. Don't forget to participate. This is the time for you to exercise your citizenship rights.